Learn how to select the right carbide inserts for machining titanium, Inconel, and other difficult alloys. Covers ISO 1832 codes, coatings, chipbreakers, and best practices with insights from top brands at CNC Tools Depot.
Machining titanium, Inconel, and other high-performance alloys presents unique challenges such as rapid tool wear, heat concentration, and work-hardening. This in-depth guide from CNC Tools Depot — the world’s largest marketplace for carbide inserts — explains how to choose the right carbide inserts, turning inserts, and milling inserts for difficult-to-machine materials.
You’ll learn how to read ISO 1832 insert nomenclature (codes like CNMG 120408), understand the impact of geometry, chipbreaker design, and coatings (CVD vs. PVD), and select insert grades optimized for aerospace, medical, oil & gas, and power-generation applications. Backed by verified references from Sandvik, Kennametal, Iscar, and other leading brands, this article bridges technical detail with plain-language explanations — making it easy for engineers, machinists, and buyers to make confident decisions.
Whether you’re cutting titanium implants, Inconel turbine disks, or other superalloy components, this guide provides step-by-step insert selection strategies, practical machining tips, and brand-neutral comparisons. Explore CNC Tools Depot to compare and source the best carbide inserts across all major manufacturers — all in one trusted marketplace.
Titanium and nickel-base superalloys (Inconel, Rene, Haynes families) are the backbone of aerospace, power-generation, oil & gas and high-performance motorsport components. They give incredible strength-to-weight and temperature resistance — but that also makes them hard on tooling. Choosing the right carbide inserts, geometry, coating and grade is the single biggest lever you have to get predictable tool life, part quality and cycle time when machining these alloys. Below you’ll find an approachable, technically accurate playbook (ISO nomenclature included) for selecting and applying inserts in these demanding materials.
Short version: they concentrate heat at the cutting edge, work-harden rapidly, and often “stick” to tool edges.
ISO 1832 defines the standard code for indexable inserts. The full code can have 12–13 symbols, but positions 1–7 are the most commonly used for turning inserts. A typical code: C N M G 12 04 08 (often written in compact form as CNMG120408). The positions mean:
Shape — e.g., C = 80° rhombic (diamond).
Relief / Clearance angle — N = 0° (neutral/negative), B = 5°, C = 7°, etc.
Tolerance / manufacturing type — M or G (M = molded/standard tolerance, G = ground/tighter tolerance in some positions).
Clamping / chipbreaker / cross-section modifier — letters here often indicate whether the insert is ground, has a chipbreaker geometry on face/back, special hole/countersink, etc. (in CNMG the “G” typically indicates a standard clamping/chipbreaker configuration).
Insert size / inscribed circle (IC) — e.g., 12 = 12.7 mm IC in metric listings.
Thickness (s) — e.g., 04 = ~4.76 mm for common CNMG metric sizes.
Corner radius — 08 = 0.8 mm nose radius (08 → 0.8 mm).
Practical translation (CNMG120408):
C = 80° diamond, N = 0° clearance (negative/neutral rake application), M = common tolerance type, G = standard clamping/chipbreaker style; IC ≈ 12.7 mm, thickness ≈ 4.76 mm, nose radius ≈ 0.8 mm. Use the ISO charts for exact tolerances and dimensions.
Think of the cutting situation as a three-legged stool: (1) geometry, (2) substrate/grade, (3) coating. If any leg fails, tool life and process reliability suffer.
Rule of thumb: use a tough substrate + coating that resists adhesion and crater wear; choose CVD for abrasion/high heat demands and PVD when a sharp, tough edge and lower adhesion are priorities — but always validate on the specific alloy and operation.
CNMG is an ISO shape/geometry code: C = 80° rhombic shape, N = 0° clearance, M = tolerance/manufacture type, G = chipbreaker/clamping style. The following numbers (e.g., 120408) give size, thickness and nose radius. See ISO 1832 for exact mappings.
There’s no one “best” insert — choose by family: for stainless use grades balancing toughness/wear (often PVD), for titanium prioritize tough substrates + adhesion-resistant coatings and chipbreakers, and for Inconel use grades with high wear/thermal resistance (sometimes PVD or specially engineered CVD stacks). Always cross-check manufacturer grade charts.
Break the code into symbol groups: shape, clearance, tolerance, clamping/chipbreaker, IC size, thickness, nose radius. (Full ISO 1832 charts list all permitted letters and numbers.) Use supplier datasheets for the exact metric/inch conversion.
CVD typically gives a thicker, harder Al₂O₃/TiCN layer that is thermally robust (good for abrasion/high-heat roughing). PVD is thinner and can give a sharper, tougher edge (good for finishing, reduced adhesion). The best choice depends on material and operation.
Very important. Long, stringy chips (titanium) or hard chips (Inconel) cause tool damage and operator hazards. Use chipbreakers engineered for the intended feed/ap — manufacturers provide charts that match feed and ap ranges to chipbreaker types.